Commercial Foundation Contractor Services in Wisconsin

Commercial Helical Anchors / Tiebacks

Helical Anchors (also referred to as tiebacks) provide lateral stability to foundation walls and retaining walls with unbalanced earth pressures. Helical anchors can be installed with hand-held equipment, mini-excavators, skid steers, backhoes, trackhoes, or crane-supported rigs so the anchors can be installed in almost any application. This versatility, along with the ability to immediately load and test the anchors, make helicals a convenient and economical solution for a wide variety of projects. helical tiebacks in Wisconsin

ADVANTAGES

  • Predictable capacity
  • Helix blade configuration selected to achieve design embedment and capacity
  • All-weather installation
  • Can be installed in areas of limited or tight access
  • Installation does not generate spoils
  • Clean installation with no messy grout
  • Load tests can be performed immediately following installation
  • Available with optional hot-dip galvanizing for added corrosion protection

Design Considerations

Helical anchors are a factory-manufactured steel foundation system consisting of a central shaft with one or more helix-shaped bearing plates, commonly referred to as blades, welded to the lead section. Extension shafts, with or without additional helix plates, are used to extend the anchor into competent load-bearing soils. Helical anchors are advanced ("screwed") into the ground with the application of torque.

The terms helical piles, screw piles, helical piers, helical anchors, helix piers, and helix anchors are often used interchangeably by specifiers. However, the term "pier" more often refers to a helical foundation system loaded in axial compression, while the term "anchor" more often refers to a helical foundation system loaded in axial tension.

Determination of Capacity

The ultimate capacity of a helical anchor may be calculated using the traditional bearing capacity equation:

Qu = ∑ [Ah (cNc + qNq)]

Where:
Qu = Ultimate Anchor Capacity (lb)
Ah = Area of Individual Helix Plate (ft2)
c = Effective Soil Cohesion (lb/ft2)
Nc = Dimensionless Bearing Capacity Factor = 9
q = Effective Vertical Overburden Pressure (lb/ft2)
Nq = Dimensionless Bearing Capacity Factor

Total stress parameters should be used for short-term and transient load applications and effective stress parameters should be used for long-term, permanent load applications. A factor of safety of 2 is typically used to determine the allowable soil bearing capacity, especially if torque is monitored during the helical anchor installation.

Like other deep foundation alternatives, there are many factors to be considered in designing a helical anchor foundation. Foundation Supportworks™ recommends that helical anchor design be completed by an experienced geotechnical engineer or other qualified professional.

Another well-documented and accepted method for estimating helical anchor capacity is by correlation to installation torque. In simple terms, the torsional resistance generated during helical anchor installation is a measure of soil shear strength and can be related to the bearing capacity of the anchor.

Qu = KT

Where:
Qu = Ultimate anchor Capacity (lb)
K = Capacity to Torque Ratio (ft-1)
T = Installation Torque (ft-lb)

The capacity to torque ratio is not a constant and varies with soil conditions and the size of the anchor shaft. Load testing using the proposed helical anchor and helix blade configuration is the best way to determine project-specific K-values. However, ICC-ES AC358 provides default K-values for varying anchor shaft sizes, which may be used conservatively for most soil conditions. The default value for the Model 150 Helical Anchor System (1.50" square shaft) is K = 10 ft-1.

-- View Our Helical Anchors and Tiebacks Product Specifications document --

Anchor Capacity

The cross section of a square shaft is very compact which can allow the anchor to penetrate more easily through the soil. This compact shape also reduces the stiffness of the cross section and introduces more potential for buckling. These two factors make square shaft helical anchors better suited for tension loads. Foundation Supportworks™, Inc. therefore recommends their use mainly for these types of applications. Square shaft helical anchors (piles) used in compression should be evaluated on a case by case basis by the project engineer.

Mechanical Axial Capacity (see note):

  • Allowable Tension = 26.5 kips*

* The mechanical tensile capacity of the Model 150 Helical Anchor System is limited by the allowable stress levels dictated by AISC for a high strength bolt in double shear. The allowable tensile capacity of the shaft is actually much higher than this Allowable Tension value.

Torque Limited Axial Design Capacities based on Ultimate Torsional
Resistance of Anchor Shaft = 6,340 ft-lbs**:

  • Ultimate Soil Capacity = 63.4 kips** (with K = 10 ft-1, see note)
  • Allowable Soil Capacity = 31.7 kips (FOS = 2, Allowable System Capacity therefore governed by mechanical capacity = 26.5 kips*)

** This Ultimate Torsional Resistance and its corresponding Torque Limited Capacities are based on laboratory test results from an IAS accredited facility and may only be approached in idealized conditions. Plastic torsional deformations can begin in the anchor shaft near 4,600 ft-lbs. This value may be reached and exceeded in the field by maintaining alignment between the anchor and the drive head, limiting impact forces and torque reversal, and reducing the tendency to "crowd" (push down on) the anchor. Installation through soils with obstructions or high variability may result in impact loading on the anchor. In these cases, achieving high torque values becomes more difficult and a further reduction in the Design Torque Limit may be appropriate.

Note

K = 10 ft-1 is a default value as published in ICC-ES AC358 which can, in many cases, be considered conservative. Higher capacities can often be achieved with site-specific load testing. Allowable capacities based on site testing shall not exceed the Mechanical Axial Capacity.

-- View Our Helical Anchors and Tiebacks Product Specifications document --

Model 150 Helical Anchor System

  • Outer Dimensions = 1.50" x 1.50"
  • Anchor Shaft Yield Strength = 90 ksi (min.)
  • Coupling Hardware: ¾" Grade 8 Bolt with Nut
  • Available Helix Blade Diameters = 6", 8", 10", 12" and 14"
  • Helix Blade Thickness = 0.375"
  • Termination Hardware: 1" Threaded Rod, Tensile Strength = 120 ksi (min.)

-- View Our Helical Anchors and Tiebacks Product Specifications document --

Model 175 Helical Anchor System

  • Outer Dimensions = 1.75" Round Corner Square Bar
  • Anchor Shaft Yield Strength = 90 ksi (min.)
  • Coupling Hardware: (2) ¾" Grade 8 Bolt with Nut
  • Available Helix Blade Diameters = 6", 8", 10", 12" and 14"
  • Helix Blade Thickness = 0.375"
  • Termination Hardware: 1" Threaded Rod, Tensile Strength = 120 ksi (min.)

-- View Our Helical Anchors and Tiebacks Product Specifications document --


Helix Blade Geometry

Foundation Supportworks' helical anchors feature blades manufactured with a true helix shape conforming to the geometry criteria of ICC-ES AC358. The leading and trailing edges of true helix blades are within one-quarter inch of parallel to each other and any radial measurement across the blade is perpendicular to the anchor shaft. A true helix shape along with proper alignment and spacing of the blades is critical to minimize soil disturbance during installation.

Conversely, blades that are not a true helix shape are often formed to a 'duckbill' appearance. These plates create a great deal of soil disturbance and do not conform to the helix geometry requirements of ICC-ES AC358 since their torque to capacity relationships are not well documented.

Looking for a price? Get a no cost, no obligation free estimate.

HelixPro Design Software

Case Studies

YMCA
Foundation Push Piers
September 2009
Fond du Lac, WI

FSIWI was then able to install the six piers in two days to an average depth of 37' 6".
Affinity Health
Foundation Push Piers
May 2009
Menasha, WI

22 hydraulically-driven push piers were used to stabilize and lift the settled area of the building.
More Case Studies...
Serving WI including the Greater Appleton area
Our Wisconsin Service Area
Cities in Dickinson County, MI
Kingsford
Norway
Quinnesec
Vulcan

Cities in Menominee County, MI
Carney
Daggett
Hermansville
Ingalls
Menominee
Powers
Spalding
Stephenson
Wallace

Cities in Adams County, WI
Adams
Arkdale
Friendship

Cities in Brown County, WI
De Pere
Denmark
Green Bay
Greenleaf
New Franken
Oneida
Pulaski
Suamico
Wrightstown

Cities in Calumet County, WI
Brillion
Chilton
Hilbert
New Holstein
Sherwood

Cities in Dodge County, WI
Brownsville
Lomira
Waupun

Cities in Door County, WI
Baileys Harbor
Brussels
Egg Harbor
Ellison Bay
Fish Creek
Forestville
Sister Bay
Sturgeon Bay

Cities in Florence County, WI
Fence
Florence
Long Lake

Cities in Fond Du Lac County, WI
Brandon
Campbellsport
Eden
Eldorado
Fond Du Lac
Malone
Mount Calvary
Oakfield
Ripon
Rosendale
Saint Cloud
Van Dyne

Cities in Forest County, WI
Argonne
Armstrong Creek
Crandon
Laona
Wabeno

Cities in Green Lake County, WI
Berlin
Green Lake
Princeton

Cities in Kewaunee County, WI
Algoma
Casco
Kewaunee
Luxemburg

Cities in Langlade County, WI
Antigo
Bryant
Deerbrook
Elcho
Elton
Pearson
Pickerel
Summit Lake
White Lake

Cities in Lincoln County, WI
Gleason
Irma
Merrill
Tomahawk

Cities in Manitowoc County, WI
Cleveland
Kiel
Manitowoc
Maribel
Mishicot
Newton
Reedsville
Two Rivers
Valders
Whitelaw

Cities in Marathon County, WI
Aniwa
Edgar
Eland
Hatley
Marathon
Mosinee
Ringle
Rothschild
Schofield
Wausau

Cities in Marinette County, WI
Amberg
Athelstane
Coleman
Crivitz
Dunbar
Goodman
Marinette
Niagara
Pembine
Peshtigo
Porterfield
Pound
Wausaukee

Cities in Marquette County, WI
Neshkoro
Westfield

Cities in Menominee County, WI
Keshena
Neopit

Cities in Oconto County, WI
Abrams
Gillett
Lakewood
Lena
Little Suamico
Mountain
Oconto
Oconto Falls
Sobieski
Suring
Townsend

Cities in Oneida County, WI
Harshaw
Pelican Lake
Rhinelander
Three Lakes

Cities in Outagamie County, WI
Appleton
Bear Creek
Black Creek
Combined Locks
Greenville
Hortonville
Kaukauna
Kimberly
Little Chute
Seymour
Shiocton

Cities in Portage County, WI
Almond
Amherst
Amherst Junction
Bancroft
Custer
Junction City
Plover
Rosholt
Stevens Point

Cities in Shawano County, WI
Birnamwood
Bonduel
Bowler
Caroline
Cecil
Gresham
Krakow
Leopolis
Shawano
Tigerton
Tilleda
Wittenberg

Cities in Sheboygan County, WI
Adell
Cascade
Cedar Grove
Elkhart Lake
Glenbeulah
Kohler
Oostburg
Plymouth
Random Lake
Sheboygan
Sheboygan Falls
Waldo

Cities in Vilas County, WI
Phelps

Cities in Waupaca County, WI
Clintonville
Fremont
Iola
Manawa
Marion
New London
Ogdensburg
Scandinavia
Waupaca
Weyauwega

Cities in Waushara County, WI
Coloma
Hancock
Pine River
Plainfield
Poy Sippi
Redgranite
Wautoma
Wild Rose

Cities in Winnebago County, WI
Larsen
Menasha
Neenah
Omro
Oshkosh
Pickett
Winneconne

Cities in Wood County, WI
Auburndale
Milladore
Nekoosa
Port Edwards
Rudolph
Vesper
Wisconsin Rapids

Please call us at: 1-888-235-8670